Good Reason

It's okay to be wrong. It's not okay to stay wrong.

‘Prick’ is no longer offensive

It’s official.

Australian court clears student on offensive language charge

An Australian student who called a police officer a “prick” has been cleared of verbal abuse charges after a judge ruled that the word was in “common usage” and therefore not offensive.

Henry Grech insulted the senior constable during an argument at a Sydney railway station last year but the offensive language case against him fell apart after the magistrate said the word was in common use.

“I consider the word prick is of a less derogatory nature than other words and it is in common usage in this country,” Robbie Williams, the Waverley Local Court magistrate, told the court on Monday.

It’s not very nice to call a police officer a prick, but if we had a few more test cases like these, it could be useful to linguists in finding out what’s considered offensive and what’s not. What a judge finds offensive may not reflect public opinion perfectly, but it does have the seal of officialdom.


  1. "It's not very nice to call a police officer a prick". Truth hurts, truth happens.

  2. No problem here. The Judge is a prick too, and he knows it. Now all that matters is whether the Judge is a dick-head and/or a cunt as well as a self-recommended prick.

    Now that we are all pricks, the value has gone out of the word!

    Same as the word 'gay.'

Comments are closed.

© 2018 Good Reason

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑