Comments for Good Reason http://goodreasonblog.com It's okay to be wrong. It's not okay to stay wrong. Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:42:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.7 Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Sunday in Outer Blogness: Still not over edition! – Main Street Plaza http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5693 Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:42:18 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5693 […] In other random fun, let’s learn about shitgibbons! […]

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Dan Bronson http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5692 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:14:05 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5692 I call your attention to;

http://theshitgibbon.com

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Duncan http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5691 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:45:19 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5691 This is great! A couple of typos though: one ‘llmpounds’ (compounds) and one ‘siller’ (sillier)

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by GORN61 http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5690 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:12:25 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5690 s/we definitely/was definitely/

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by GORN61 http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5689 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:11:30 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5689 An early one (from the late 90s, perhaps) that I remember is “knobjockey”. It has functional overtones, but we definitely an insult. I speculate that it may have fallen from common use because of casual homophobic connotations (one would almost always apply it to a man).

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Daniel Midgley http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5688 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:50:50 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5688 Yarr. I was getting it confused with /ʍ/.

Hey, then that’s even better! No fricatives to be seen. Unless someone can think of a counter-example.

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Carrie http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5687 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:58:48 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5687 /w/ isn’t a fricative. 🙂

]]>
Comment on Shitgibbon frequencies by Episode 275: The Linguistic Listician (featuring Arika Okrent) – Talk the Talk http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/#comment-5686 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:26:32 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3782#comment-5686 […] Shitgibbon frequencies (by Daniel) http://goodreasonblog.com/2017/02/shitgibbon-frequencies/ […]

]]>
Comment on Trump and The Sound of Music by Sunday in Outer Blogness: Still not OK edition! – Main Street Plaza http://goodreasonblog.com/2016/11/trump-and-the-sound-of-music/#comment-5685 Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:36:53 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3779#comment-5685 […] So, the reason I didn’t get SiOB done yesterday is explained in this helpful comic. I was thinking that rounding up this past week’s Mormon discussion would distract me from our current crisis of democracy, but it appears that the LDS-interest bloggers are also still talking about the election. […]

]]>
Comment on Trump and The Sound of Music by Stephen http://goodreasonblog.com/2016/11/trump-and-the-sound-of-music/#comment-5684 Sun, 13 Nov 2016 06:08:33 +0000 http://goodreasonblog.com/?p=3779#comment-5684 Unfortunately for us all, history appears to be repeating itself again. Dangit.

]]>