Could Christianity die out within a century? This article says:
Christianity ‘could die out within a century’
Research by the Orthodox Jewish organisation Aish found that just over a third of people thought religions like Christianity and Judaism would still be practiced in Britain in 100 years’ time.
Although four in 10 people said they would choose to be a member of the Christian religion, almost the same number said they would rather practice no religion at all.
Hmm. The Extinction of the Monotheisms sounds good until you start thinking about what’s going to replace them. The poor thinking that causes religion isn’t going to go away until humans get better brains, and how long is that going to take?
The new religions are probably going to take the form of Teh Secret or something. Some kind of feel-good new-agey proto faith that doesn’t require a lot of time or commitment, but that seems to give results to those who are magically minded.
And that includes a lot of smart people. I just got an email from a smart friend who I love dearly, but he attached a PDF that he thought was wonderful. It’s called “The Master Key” by Charles F. Haanel. Here’s a link to a PDF of the first two parts only. (Even so, it’s 1.2 meg of woo.) Maybe you’d rather read about the Master Key from this site.
It has been said that The Master Key System is the book that Bill Gates read just before leaving Harvard to start his own computer software business, which made him the wealthiest man in the world.
Any evidence for the Gates tie-in?
This book holds the secret of a powerful system of success, which was used by the author, Charles F. Haanel to amass his own mega-fortune through the starting of his own company, which he built into one of the largest conglomerates of his time.
And its name is…?
The Master Key System, which was originally published in 1912, sold over 200,000 copies before it was banned by the church in 1933 and was then lost to the public for some seventy years.
Anyone’s da Vinci Code alarm going off?
The Master Key System lays down the foundation of the principles of creative manifestation through the Law of Attraction, as Haanel understood them. You will learn how to develop and use the creative instrument of your mind—creating true abundance in your life and opening up to the limitless possibilities of the truly creative life.
Wait a minute. The Law of…
It’s Teh Proto-Secret! Well, damn. I am impressed. Haanel must have been a hundred years before his time. Of course, a hundred years early on bullshit’s still bullshit.
Now, that’s not fair. I haven’t even read the thing yet, and here I am being all closed-minded. Bad critical thinker! Bad!
That’s better. Let’s take a look. Here we are, page 7.
22. We are related to the world within by the subconscious mind. The solar plexus is the organ of this mind; the sympathetic system of nerves presides over all subjective sensations, such as joy, fear, love, emotion, respiration, imagination and all other subconscious phenomena. It is through the subconscious that we are connected with the Universal Mind and brought into relation with the Infinite constructive forces of the Universe.
Well, that all seems perfaaaaauuuuggggghhhhhhhhhh…….
Sorry, part of my pre-frontal lobe just turned to goo. I think I just lost algebra.
In one paragraph, we have specious claims about the mind/body connection, conflation of emotions with autonomic nervous processes (hey, kids, did you know that your solar plexus could do all that?), a construct called the Universal Mind but no evidence for it, and enough fluffy talk to put a horse to sleep. That’s some concentrated woo there. I think the jargon to evidence ratio just approached infinity, and when that happens, we run the risk of Universe Collapse.
I’ve written about Teh Secret before. People think the Master Key or The Secret works because of confirmation bias. Sometimes you get what you want, sometimes you don’t, but if you’re focusing on it, you’ll notice when you do, and forget when you don’t. And of course, you’re much more likely to get what you want if you’re working at it than if you’re not. Nothing mystical about it, and certainly nothing to do with your solar plexus.
So I’m in the car with the ropes and the duct tape, ready to tie up my friend and subject him to the Daniel Course for Critical Thinking (which I haven’t even written yet) when I think, “Hey, what does it matter? Is it going to hurt him if he believes some woo here and there? What harm is there in a false belief?”
Here are my answers. See what you think.
1. Magical thinking leaves you susceptible to scams. Buying into a really bad premise makes it possible to buy into more. Examples?
- If you accept that supernatural beings exist, then it follows that you’d better try to find out what they want you to do. Next it’s joining and supporting a church or some other non-empirical system with your money and time. Bad idea.
- If you accept that the universe has a Consciousness, then it’s not that preposterous to think that you can influence it to get what you want. Soon, you’re trying superstitious methods to get it (which don’t work). Superstition is a waste of time, and it leaves you helpless before its purveyors.
- If gurus know the Secret of Life better than you do, then it follows that you should fork out cash to get their wisdom.
On and on. Critical thinking can save us from scammers.
2. Lack of critical thinking harms societies, not just people. A society full of delusional people is not healthy, and will have a harder time solving its problems. The more empirically-minded people we have, the more our collective knowledge grows, and the more likely we are to find working solutions to the problems that face us. I noticed this story about people who are trying to have lower petrol prices… through prayer. So far, somehow, not effective. What if everyone just prayed, instead of a) working to develop technologies for alternative energy, b) changing the way they live to conserve a bit more?
What I’m advocating is acceptance of critical thinking and rejection of superstition. Not replacement of one superstition with another. This is only going to get more important in the post-religion vacuum.
24 June 2008 at 10:48 am
According the the anthrop people downstairs from you, religion isn’t going anywhere anyway.
25 June 2008 at 2:29 am
Man, the church must be super powerful. They banned this book and it was LOST to the public for over 70 years? That is some strempf right there kid! Thats just like what they did with that “Lady Chatterly’s Lover” book, they banned that one so well, that I’ve never even heard of it, ever.
I don’t find the concept that Christianity in the classic sense will fade away as too hard to believe, especially when I look at the popularity of org’s like Rick Warren’s church and the like. It’s just feel-good watered-down pap. You can mix and match your doctrine like it’s the Gap.Just don’t bone any dudes and you can be a Flat Earth Buddhist for all they care.
However I think the more stringent sects that control the whole communal environment of their members are on the chopping block first (I’m not biased or anything, but even the numbers seem to bear this out).
Consider this passage from a religious journal known as the TatchWower (the name has been changed to protect the flatulent).
“[A] mature Christian must be in unity and full harmony with fellow believers as far as faith and knowledge are concerned. He does not advocate or insist on personal opinions or harbour private ideas when it comes to Bible understanding. Rather, he has complete confidence in the truth as it is revealed by Jehovah God through his Son, Jesus Christ, and ‘the faithful and discreet slave’.”
Ain’t that a kick in the pants? Don’t harbour any private ideas Daniel, always make sure you stay Double-Plus Good.
I would add that superstition makes ‘hidden evidence’ much harder to take into consideration. You’re amazed at my story that I prayed for my survival as the boat was sinking, and you’re belief helps you disregard those people who prayed but still drowned. Which I guess is really just a long-winded way of saying cognitive dissonance.
26 June 2008 at 8:43 am
If you ever run a Daniel Course for Critical Thinking let me know! I know a few people who could benefit from that kind of thing.
27 June 2008 at 4:46 am
Interestingly enough, the first-year philosophy unit on critical thinking at UWA was taught by Reverend Richard Borthwick. I don’t think he teaches it currently, but he did when I started my degree.
27 June 2008 at 3:13 pm
Is he the one I always see walking around the Arts building wearing the collar?
I always want to talk to him and find out what his bag is, but I haven’t yet.
I suppose with critical thinking as with many disciplines, the pure/applied distinction is in effect.