Good Reason

It's okay to be wrong. It's not okay to stay wrong.

Category: post (page 99 of 125)

Deconversion stories: the framework

I remember the Sunday that I became an atheist. I was in church trying to sort everything out. The temple of faith was feeling creakier than usual, and the usual amount of plaster wasn’t covering the cracks. Truth be told, I actually resented having to resort to ad hoc justifications in the face of inconvenient facts. So I didn’t go to the adult classes. I went to the Primary classes for kids. I thought if I could just start from the beginning, maybe I could build again without too many contradictions.

What were my options? Maybe I could be a deist. That seemed plausible for about five seconds. You can’t be a Mormon deist.

What got me here? Partly a realisation that the claims of religion were either not possible to evaluate or just plain counterfactual, but that was only one part of the story. A religion isn’t just a set of beliefs; it’s a philosophical worldview with a built-in social network. Deciding to leave takes a bit more than just changing your mind.

My deconversion story has three elements to it, three conditions that had to exist at the same time for deconversion to take place. I suspect that these three conditions are necessary not just for me, but for anyone who is going to get out of a belief system that they are deeply committed to.

It became important to me that my beliefs be grounded in fact.

Not desire, not faith, and not wishful thinking. In short, in order for my beliefs to be worthwhile, I decided that they had to be true in a factual sense.

For most of my life, I believed that it was more important to keep believing in the Church than it was to believe the facts. I didn’t think of it that way at the time because I didn’t think there was any difference. The Church taught eternal truths, science taught earthly truths, and any discrepancies would be ironed out in the fullness of time as scientists learned more and prophets revealed more. In the meantime, I accepted Church teachings as definitive. I am somewhat ashamed to say that if I ran across a fact that contradicted a cherished belief, I kept the belief and tossed the fact. After all, facts are always up for reanalysis, aren’t they? That I never did the reanalysis didn’t seem to bother me much, but at some point it began to.

This brings me to two:

It became clear to me that my beliefs were either not supported by fact, or contradicted the facts directly.

This required education into what constitutes good evidence and good arguments. I’d learned about fallacies long ago, but had given religion a pass. A renewed interest in the scientific method and an intense skepticism were instrumental.

Still, these two facets of deconversion were not enough to convince me to break free of religious doctrine. There was an emotional component.

I lost the fear of what might happen if the belief system were false.

Beliefs have consequences, as any believer will tell you. Just expressing a belief can get you into a community of faith — or out. All my life, I was taught that an eternity of blessings was waiting for me after my death, if only I could have faith in the meantime. But if that wasn’t so, I was wasting my short life. The stakes were huge. And so for a long time I avoided looking into the abyss. It was too painful and I had so much invested in my comforting faith.

The consequences would extend to my human relationships, as well. Would people at Church say, “Well, looks like old Brother Midgley couldn’t hack the program”? Though I’m strong enough to endure the slings and arrows of outrageous calumny, it still bothered me that some would take my deconversion as a sign of weakness. And would I be able to give up the network of religious support in favour of… nothing?

But with my knowledge of defense mechanisms defeating their own usefulness, and the cognitive dissonance growing, something had to give. That day in the chapel I said to myself, “I’ll be an atheist, then.”

Something clicked. I felt a rush of fear, holding on to nothing, ground gone. Then, amazingly, the universe failed to fall apart, and I kept on living. And I have kept doing so up to now. I gave up on faith, and got a knowledge of things as they are. Or as close as I can get.

In this million-part series, I’ll be exploring aspects of my own deconversion story along the three conditions above. I’ll be looking forward to your stories as well.

31% approval">Bush at 31% approval

Obviously, he’s not conservative enough.

“It’s a good slap in the face,” said Andy Dlinn, a Pittsburgh businessman and leader of the Pennsylvania Republican Assembly, a grass-roots group that believes the GOP is not conservative enough and needs to move to the right.

I will do everything I can to perpetuate this meme. The hard part will be keeping a straight face.

Random Five: What took you so long?

I’m enjoying the latest iTunes, even though it’s a memory hog and its DRM is still evil. Two reasons: it goes out and finds album artwork for you, which would normally be a tedious chore, and it displays your covers as seen in the screen grab. It’s like taking all your booklets out and cleverly arranging them on an extremely shiny black surface.

Altar Natives by Bill Nelson’s Orchestra Arcana Album:Iconography
Sometimes I think my collection is bland and full of commercially prepared pap branded as ‘alternative’ even though anyone in the world could get it at Target. Then I feel like an elitist for thinking that’s a bad thing. But I do sometimes wish I had some weird or different things in there. Then I find some Bill Nelson, the most interesting artist to labour in obscurity since Stephen Duffy. If I have Bill, how mainstream could I be? Only marginally, that’s to what extent. Every Bill Nelson fan thinks they’re the only Bill Nelson fan. Maybe they’re right.

Anyhow, this one comes from a time when Bill Nelson recorded as ‘Orchestra Arcana’ to avoid some messy contract legalities. His deviousness is our gain. On this track he uses one of his favourite song templates: a long flowing chord, overlaid with rhythmic loops of speech, found speeches on esoteric Christian mysticism, and guitar improvisations.

The Forest (from the film ‘The Snow Queen’) by Jukka Linkola, conductor Album:Northern Lights Vol. 2
The fame of Good Reason‘s earliest and most stalwart blog patron snowqueen has been celebrated in song and celluloid. A soothing and magical orchestral piece that chronicles her ‘blue period’ and all those concerts.

Last Dance by Sarah McLachlan Album:Surfacing
Do you like Sarah MacLachlan? Me neither. I sure do have a lot of her songs though. Maybe I have a subliminal ‘liking SML’ thing.

On the other hand, how many songs do I have that feature old piano, cello, and saw? I’m serious; someone’s playing a saw with a violin bow, like in the movie Delicatessen. All right, Sarah; you’re not Kate, but you’re okay. You might even be Tori. Or that one woman from the Dresden Dolls. On second thought, be sort of glad you’re not.

Let the Right One Slip In by Morrissey Album:Tomorrow (Single)
Okay, single entendre title aside, I think this song must have been written to be used in the title sequence for an 80’s teen movie. The hero wakes up, grabs his skateboard, sails down a hill (long distance shot with opening credits), and runs to the double glass doors of the high school where other students are entering. There’s a ‘getting to class’ montage with a hallway of lockers. You can picture it, can’t you?

Tour de France Etape 1 – Chrono – Tour de France Etape 2 by Kraftwerk Album:Minimum-Maximum
More live Kraftwerk this week. Good.

I always thought this piece was ambitious on the studio album. They haven’t put out new material in close to 20 years, so already they’re deciding to risk their god-like status by putting out a new album. And the first song is this 15-minute epic cycling soundtrack, like Autobahn on two wheels. And yet it works. Their fine sense of melody combines with absorbing rhythm and effects. This 10-minute live version is just right.

Republicans: You are in Time Out.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (doesn’t that sound nice?) is talking a lot about bipartisanship, working together with Republicans, and so forth. I hope Digby‘s right and it’s all just talk. Bipartisanship is a fine thing, but it only works with people who are not psychos.

I say ‘psychos’ because the Republicans carried out government with sociopathically thuggish petulance, shutting Democrats out of the process. Check out the Rolling Stone article for examples like the following:

According to the rules, conferences have to include at least one public, open meeting. But in the Bush years, Republicans have managed the conference issue with some of the most mind-blowingly juvenile behavior seen in any parliament west of the Russian Duma after happy hour. GOP chairmen routinely call a meeting, bring the press in for a photo op and then promptly shut the proceedings down. “Take a picture, wait five minutes, gavel it out — all for show” is how one Democratic staffer described the process. Then, amazingly, the Republicans sneak off to hold the real conference, forcing the Democrats to turn amateur detective and go searching the Capitol grounds for the meeting. “More often than not, we’re trying to figure out where the conference is,” says one House aide.

As a parent, I have a suggestion. It’s Time Out.

I don’t like to use Time Out, because it’s too commonly used by frustrated parents who want to silence or punish angry kids. However, used rarely, Time Out is very helpful when a child has clearly lost control and needs to cool down and clear the mind. After some time away from the scene of conflict, the child and the parent can return to the situation with a bit of focus, or just a change of mood.

Now, if it were Speaker Midgley (we’d all be in big trouble, but) I’d say, “Republicans: You are in Time Out. When you can shown that you have the ability to act in a grown-up fashion, then you can rejoin us. Until then, we’ll be taking care of things.”

I like this approach because this way the Democrats aren’t inviting more abuse from the very same people who got us in this situation. It also puts a ‘spoiled child’ frame on Republicans, which regular people with kids can grasp easily.

Of course, I’m not a politician, and I’m not actually very good at working with people to scam resources. (Pity.) Maybe it’s a terrible idea, and Pelosi is playing it the right way. You talk bipartisan comity, get a reputation for being friendly and nice, and then no one notices when you crush the other guys. But the way the Republicans have acted, they deserve to sit in their room for a few years, and think about what they did.

A blow to the Democrats

The elections have dealt a devastating setback to Democrats as they win the House, the Senate, a majority of governorships, and Rumsfeld’s ouster. Political observers are now wondering if the Democratic Party can survive this humiliating victory. For now, jubilant conservatives are claiming a win.

“The undisputed winner of the 2006 election is marriage,” said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America (CWA).

Opponents “tried to convince citizens that these marriage amendments would take away heterosexual couples’ rights. But the word and concept are clear: marriage is the mysterious, irreplaceable relationship of a husband and wife,” she stated.

No mystery here, Wendy. Married couples are probably the only thing stopping God from destroying us all right this minute!

And let’s not forget Reagan, who led conservatism to this grand victory.

The New York Times analyzed the House races in these midterms last week, and found that the Democrats have had to find more conservative candidates in order to compete with the GOP.

It shows the success of the Reagan message, and once again underscores the profound impact he had on American politics.

And how do the nation’s conservative talking heads feel about this stunning defeat for Democrats? Rush Limbaugh says:

I feel liberated.

Probably in much the same way that Bush liberated Iraq.

The election news looks grim indeed for Democrats. Will they be able to recover from their overreach?

2006 elections

When Clinton won in 1992, I danced on the couch. The results aren’t all in yet, but at this stage it’s looking like the Democrats will take over the House and perhaps the Senate, if Virginia and Montana hold in there through the recounts and legal action.

Honestly, I won’t be happy anyway. Even if the Dems take both houses of Congress, I’d still want to see Dick Cheney perp-walked to the International Criminal Court in the Hague. And immediate impeachment proceedings. And why is it such a squeaker anyway? The most corrupt and incompetant leadership in 230 years, and Republicans manage to hang on to even one seat?

But these things take time. So for now I’ll be happy with just the House. And I’m getting my dancing shoes on.

Friday Random Five with little skill are plied.

This week I find myself listening to a lot of Karma County, a very good Australian band whose sound is earthy and heartfelt, and maybe just a little strung out. You don’t know if these are guys you’d want to play poker with, but the music they make is very soulful.

Their song ‘Postcard’ is well worth a listen. The ‘ba ba ba’ chorus stays on the same notes, even while the chord structure drops lower and lower down the scale. Very artful. Have a listen and you’ll see what I mean. Click this link, go to ‘Music’, and hit the ‘Album Preview’ button for the album that matches the picture you see here. It’s track four.

The lyrics remind me of Jeff:

God speed my friend,
be sure to think of me
when you touch down,
cast out on a different sea.

Just a postcard,
every now and then,
just to let me know
that you’re okay.

On to the random.

Music Non Stop by Kraftwerk Album: Minimum-Maximum
You know what I like about this album? Not that it’s live — Kraftwerk has never been known as radical improvisationalists. No, I just like that it exists. Kraftwerk touring? This is amazing, and I’ll tell you why.

The guys from Kraftwerk are not tremendously accessible people. The story is told of how Florian (or is it Ralf?) didn’t want to have a phone with a ringer on it in the studio. There was a procedure if you wanted to call them. You had to call at just a few seconds to noon. At precisely noon every day, Ralf (or Florian) would lift the phone to see if anyone wanted to talk. And that’s how you could phone them. So shy of the limelight were they that they found innovative ways to avoid performing, especially using robot surrogates (which suited their electronic style very well).

The other reason they never toured was because they couldn’t. It would have required inconveniently large rooms full of computer equipment to perform live. But now that computers have shrunk, they can do the whole thing on laptops. They were so far into the future that they had to wait for technology to catch up with them. And that’s the other reason I love that this album exists.

‘Music Non Stop’ was a little dull on the 1986 album Electric Café, but it’s been fine-tuned into a funky beast for the live shows.

Handel: Music for the Royal Fireworks – V Menuet I & II (Andante) by Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra; Bernard Haitink, conductor Album: Water Music & Music for the Royal Fireworks
Handel wrote some magnificent music. I like imagining this being played on a boat, floating up the Thames. As indeed it was, for King George I — hence the name.

Here’s the history:

On Wednesday 17 July 1717, in the evening, there occurred in London a royal event of great splendour. King George I and a large gathering of the English nobility boarded open barges on the river Thames at Whitehall and sailed up river to Chelsea, where they took supper. Such was the success of the evening that the party did not leave until three o’clock in the morning, the King arriving back at St James’s Palace at about half-past four. One of the river barges (according to a report in the Daily Courant of 19 July) ‘was employ’d for the Musick, wherein were 50 instruments of all sorts who play’d… the finest Symphonies, compos’d express for this Occasion, by Mr Hendel: which his Majesty liked so well, that he caus’d it to be plaid over three times in going and returning’.

Orchestra on a boat, Handel conducting. Now that was the way to ride.

Cigarettes Will Kill You by Ben Lee Album: Triple J Hottest 100, Volume 6
Always good to go back to this song. It’s not about cigarettes though — it’s more a metaphorical exploration of how we cook and eat the ones we love. Hmm.

Mayfly by Belle & Sebastian Album: If You’re Feeling Sinister
I have to say, this song would be less effective without the cheesy organ solo. Do you ever get the feeling that we just don’t deserve bands like Belle and Sebastian? They seem too sweet and pleasant to exist.

All in the Golden Afternoon by Alphaville Album: Prostitute
An album a lot of people missed, which is too bad because there are a lot of good moments on it. This is actually a setting of the Lewis Carroll poem where he describes a boat ride with the three Liddell girls who would serve as the model for Alice. It’s a lovely setting for the poem — almost more of a painting, really.

Off on another outing

I wasn’t really aware of evangelical Christian pastor Ted Haggard, apparently the leader of some Colorado giga-church with tens of thousands of followers and an advisor to G. W. Bush to boot. And an outspoken ‘defender of marriage’ (read: critic of gay marriage).

Well, he’s just quit his job amid allegations of gayness. In a really awkward way.

A few things:

1) Why do people say that gays want to destroy marriage? Some gay people are among marriage’s most passionate defenders.

2) Are there any Republican anti-gays who aren’t gay? I know I’m falling victim to the availability heuristic, but the number of outed homophobes is surprisingly high. Foley drafted laws to protect kids from the very kind of exploitation that he was perpetrating. Former Spokane mayor Jim West, notoriously anti-gay, resigned after he was found to have a thing for boys. Now when I see someone denouncing homosexuals, I wonder if I’m not looking at some kind of closet case. Because who else would care about it if they weren’t so obsessed? (As always, see Wolcott for the last word.)

3) Though it may seem unrelated, this is really bad for Republicans so close to the election. Voters are no longer surprised by hypocrisy, and this will only confirm the impression that people who tout good-old fashioned morality are getting up to something on the side. That reflects badly on Republicans, who, having tied their fortunes to the evangelical Christian vote, are now ill-equipped to disassociate themselves from the actions of prominent evangelical Christians. Plus, mass disillusionment is bad for the status quo.

4) Watch: the Right Wing will complain that lefties are anti-gay. We’re not. We’re anti-hypocrisy, like many (though not all) on the Right.

5) It’s really sad that he was living a double life for so long. It’s hard to feel happy when you’re doing something you think is wrong. Maybe now that things are in the open for Mr Haggard, he can put himself together, live the kind of life he wants, and feel like he has integrity for the first time in years.

That’s quite the stick on that figure.

The importance of knowing your typography:

School officials apologized after an X-rated font was used on a third-grade spelling packet handed out to parents. The font showed male and female stick figures in provocative poses to form the letters of the alphabet.

The font in question is, of course, the infamous GroupSex.
From the local paper:

Sources said the teacher had no idea the alphabet was offensive when she downloaded the font from the Internet. It’s unclear if any disciplinary action has been or will be taken against the teacher, who sources said has been with the district for many years.

“I definitely believe it was a mistake,” said Kelly Stegmann, Pine Tree Parent Teacher Association president. Stegmann said she received very few calls from parents about it.

Mistake? The teacher failed to notice that she was downloading and installing a font called ‘GroupSex’? And then chose it from the menu, not realising that she was choosing a font that said ‘GroupSex’? Is this like the ‘mistake’ I made when I downloaded 1,500 pictures of breasts, without realising what I was looking at?

No, if you’re going to do erotic typography, you do it properly and unapologetically. In fact, I recommend ‘Vintage Erotique‘.
Now that’s worth giving to parents.

Colonfest 2006

Each of these books is currently for sale, except one, which I just made up. Can you figure out which of the obtusely overwritten titles is fake? Click to see if you’re right. No fair if you’ve already read them.

  • The Enemy At Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibilty for 9/11
  • Helpless Nation: How to Defend Yourself Against the Liberal Plot to Disarm America
  • The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party
  • Liberal Fascism: The Totalitarian Temptation from Mussolini to Hillary Clinton
  • The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life
  • Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today’s Democratic Party
  • State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America

Have you ever seen a more worked-up bunch of writers? And that’s tricky. Writing is so seemingly sedate. You may have seen writers’ warm-up exercises: ‘Write from the perspective of a plant’ or ‘Write whatever is in your head without stopping for five minutes’. For them it must be ‘Imagine a liberal murdering your mother with an axe’ or ‘Scream with incoherent rage for an hour’.

People on the Left are just target practice for these authors. The targets are whole groups of people: gays, liberals, democrats, liberal democrats, gays, people with dark skin, people that work in the judiciary, people from countries that aren’t America, and gays.

Liberals take potshots as well, but it’s usually at specific people and not groups. It’s always Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld — the actual people that are in charge of forming the most ruinous policies. I was unable to uncover any similar books from the Left that identify (say) ‘wingnuts’ or evangelical Christians or any other broad group of people as ‘the problem’. Oh sure, we may shake our heads in disbelief at them, but the problem is the leadership; not the people. For people like these apoplectic right-wing authors, other people are the problem.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2026 Good Reason

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑