Good Reason

It's okay to be wrong. It's not okay to stay wrong.

Page 95 of 126

The angry atheist

Off a tip from snowqueen, I’ve been watching the Mr Deity videos on YouTube. Wickedly funny! I had no idea that God was like a Hollywood executive. But suddenly a lot of things make sense. ‘Mr Deity’ is occasionally scathing, as though written by someone who’s heard all the lame rationalisations for God’s inaction.

And so I wasn’t surprised to learn this from Mr Deity’s FAQ.

Brian, what is your stand on Religion?
I am a formerly religious person (non-bitter), and as such, have great sympathies for the beliefs and feelings of religious people.

The first and great commandment is: Thou shalt not be bitter.

But notice:

In future episodes, I intend to turn the tables a bit and poke fun at what I call the “angry atheists” (of whom I am not fond). We’ll see if they take it so well.

And the second is like unto it: Thou shalt not be angry.

I suspect that this is a stereotype we’re going to see for the next several decades: The Angry Atheist. Too bad it’s being promoted by a funny satirist like Mr Deity. It was pulled out by Fox News asshat John Kasich, who angrily asked a smiling Brian Flemming (of Blasphemy Challenge fame) why he was so angry. Are we going to have to walk around with big fake churchy smiles on our faces, just so we can debunk this meme?

But maybe this is a good chance to address the Anger Issue. Richard Dawkins was once mystified during a talk when someone asked him if he thought anger was a natural part of the deconversion process. He wasn’t sure, so he turned the question back on the audience, who responded resoundingly: Yes.

Yes, we are angry. I am angry. Why shouldn’t I be? I have wasted hours and years of my life on a flimsy set of ideas that claimed to be true. I’ve paid thousands of dollars to a religious organisation that promoted fiction. I knocked on doors for two years of my limited life in the hope of convincing someone of a set of absurdly stupid beliefs. I testified that these beliefs were true for the very worst reason: I had had a feeling that they were true.

While I’m thinking about it, allow me to take this opportunity to make an apology. People of Perth, Australia: I am sorry that I ever troubled you for one second about religion, the fictional plan of salvation, and made-up gods and scriptures. In a small way, it’s a comfort that so few of you believed me.

And yet, who am I angry at?

My parents? Not really; they were fooled too. They were just trying to do their best, and get me to heaven where we could live as a family forever, la lee la lee la.

Myself? I feel like I should have figured it out sooner. But I was given shitty tools to find truth. And it’s hard to overcome years of training, especially when you’ve received (as you suppose) a message from God confirming everything. And invested so much in it. So I guess I did figure it out eventually, when it was difficult. In a way, I’m actually sort of pleased with myself.

People who still believe? I confess to a flash of ire now and again that people can still be theists, but that’s because I sometimes forget what it was like, and how hard it was to change. When I remember that, I can forgive them for continuing.

I’ve heard that one of the important psychological jobs of adulthood is to be able to forgive your parents for their failings. I’ve seen twenty- and thirty-somethings that still burn with rage over things their parents did, and that’s not healthy. In like manner, it’s important to forgive your religion of origin (and the people therein) for promoting the God delusion.

Angry atheists: your anger is real and justified. Now sort it out, and be healthy. Fight theism with relentless cold reason.

Prayer doesn’t work; no one notices.

Drought conditions persist in Australia, despite the prayers of many faithful Christians and the fasting of Latter-day Saints. Theologians are baffled as to the continuing refusal of God to assist, despite his omnipotence and allegedly benevolent nature. But the faithful have no shortage of reasons:

  1. God doesn’t have to prove anything to you, man! He created this planet!
  2. Well, often in scripture, things are meant to be understood spiritually and not physically. So God actually has alleviated our spiritual ‘drought’. With new convert baptisms. Heh.
  3. The important thing is not ending the drought. The important thing is to build faith in God. Which we can best accomplish by faith-promoting tests that don’t work.
  4. But he has ended the drought! It’s over! Can’t you see the rain falling? Come on, kids! Let’s put on our raincoats and splash in the puddles! Ha ha ha! Whoopee!
  5. I think some rain did fall in the mining regions. That should count.
  6. What are you talking about? No such fast was ever announced. Now let us never speak of this again.
  7. The rain will come in the Lord’s own time. We just need to be patient. The farmers won’t even need it until it’s time to plant. I’m sure the big guy will come through then.
  8. Isn’t God great? God’s so awesome! La la la! I can’t hear you!
  9. I think there was a fast a while ago, but the whole thing has entirely slipped my mind, and no one at church has ever mentioned it again.
  10. The Lord is testing our faith. Or Satan is tempting us. I’m not sure which — it’s awfully hard to tell the difference.
  11. Gee, I guess prayer doesn’t work. OW — crippling paradigm shift! Oh, the pain! That I could unsay those words! Aaargh… excruciating…

Friday Random Five makes the rockin’ world go round.

Today was Australia Day, and you know what that means: music. Specifically the JJJ Hottest 100, which I found strangely uncompelling this year, not because I didn’t know the songs. (I did.) I voted again this year, and I’m willing to lay it all on the line for you now. Ridicule and suck.

  • Beck – No Complaints
  • Belle & Sebastian – Funny Little Frog
  • Belle & Sebastian – The Blues Are Still Blue
  • Midnight Juggernauts – Shadows
  • Kimya Dawson – I Like Giants
  • Augie March – One Crowded Hour
  • Peter Bjorn & John – Young Folks
  • Sonic Youth – Incinerate
  • Thom Yorke – Atoms For Peace
  • Thom Yorke – Black Swan

Basically anything I thought was good enough to download (legally) or buy.

But look at the final list. Sure, a lot of my picks were there (and in fact the Augie March tune made it to number 1). But no Belle? No Midnight Jugs? No Dawson? Instead the list is clogged with trendy stuff that, really, you wouldn’t even borrow a year from now.

So I say a curmudgeonly ‘harrumph!’ and retreat to my own musical zone, where delights new and old are always around the corner.

Fat Bottomed Girls by Queen
Album: Greatest Hits

Did Queen really get a bunch of nearly nude fat women to stage a mock bicycle race? Or did I dream it? Never mind. I’m trying to think of a song that combines fat fetishism with a positive take on child sex abuse, and I’m coming up with nothing.

The Clock by Thom Yorke
Album: The Eraser

This album works for me where other Radiohead albums don’t, and here’s (I think) why. The band carries a weight, and without them, the album feels lighter. It works well with the edgy paranoia, more electronic, more nimble. Take this track — the tick of the percussion speeds along like time itself, with Mr Yorke’s vocals dancing along the top. More chill than chill — almost uncomfortably cold.

Wear Your Love Like Heaven by Sarah McLachlan
Album: Solace

I love random songs. How often would I take this disc out and play it? Never, that’s how. But then I’d be missing this sunny tune from the ex-Nettwerk artist Sarah McL. And that’d be a shame. And if it annoys me, it’s over soon. Which it rather does. Never mind. Onward.

I Wanna Be a Cowboy (12″ Saddle Mix) by Boys Don’t Cry
Album: I Wanna Be a Cowboy (Single)

An Aussie band from the 80’s, who charted with this hit in the USA. I think they came to Spokane once. Jeff saw them; I didn’t. (Jeffrey — tell them the ‘ta very much’ story.)

So here’s a guy who wants to be a cowboy. And you can be his cowgirl. His name is Ted. Which is funny. In fact, this is a really funny song, especially when Cowboy Ted’s girlfriend expresses her ambivalence about the dust and dirt of the trail (complete with robust cowboy chorus). Yippee yippee yi, yippee yo, yo, yo.

But then check the ending – existentialist angst where you least expect it: “My name is Ted. And one day… I’ll be dead, yo yo yo.” Where did that come from? And it has a good beat and it’s easy to dance to. I give it a nine out of ten.

All the Money or the Simple Life Honey by The Dandy Warhols
Album: Triple J Hottest 100, Volume 13

From last year’s Triple J Hottest 100. The Dandy Warhols are a band that I’m not always very interested in, but they’ve put out some great songs over the years, and I’m always surprised by how good their work is. Check their “Thirteen Tales” album; “Solid” is getting heavy play on my computer this week. This song is a good example of how to use a horn section to beef up an otherwise thin idea for a song.

Look out: it’s another Hottest 100 winner from 1998:

Dragula by Rob Zombie
Album: Hellbilly Deluxe

I decided to include this sixth song because, really, there aren’t enough webpages with Rob Zombie’s picture on them, especially looking like this. In retrospect, his decision to direct slasher b-movies should have been obvious. Still a great song. It does the quiet loud quiet thing well. Is the ‘drag’ in ‘Dragula’ supposed to be, like, him in drag? Because putting that on top of this song is scarier than anything I can think of. Or is it supposed to be motor-fueled carnage? Like the “Nyak-Nyak” comic book from the Wiseblood single? Perhaps both? Mr Zombie’s oeuvre is rich enough to suggest both without giving it all away.

Get responsibly with Frank Luntz.

The reason I hate the Huffington Post is that they carry articles by nimrods like Deepak Chopra and Frank Luntz.

The reason I love the HuffPo is that every time they do, commenters take them out to the woodshed and give them a well-deserved public stropping with the switch of reason.

Take the latest by dishonest Republican shill and word-twister Frank Luntz. He’s warning Democrats not to use words in nasty or irresponsible ways.

The Republicans are a party in peril, but all is not milk and cookies in Democrat land. The Democrats – flush with majority status – have a crucial choice right now. They can use their newly-won mandate to settle some old scores…or they can get responsibly and move ahead. They would be wise to opt for the latter.

Democracy is at its best when its practioners use language to unite and explain rather than divide and attack.

Fine words from someone who helped Republicans in their destructive quest to win at all costs. Now that his party’s down, suddenly he realises the value of Being Nice.

The Democratic Party has only done well when they’ve ignored the trollishly helpful advice from conservative creeps like ol’ Frank here.

Luntz, you call yourself a linguist? Shame, sir. Linguists are scientists. You, sir, are a hack. I’ll see to having you disbarred.

The earth… no, wait… the… uh…

This is old, but it absolutely floored me when I found it today.

Every couple of years, the National Science Foundation puts out data from surveys about science and technology. And every once in a while, they ask this innocuous question:

Does the Earth go around the Sun, or does the Sun go around the Earth?

Think carefully.

Now in 2004, what percentage of Americans got it right? Take a guess, and then highlight the blank space underneath to see if you were close.

Only 71% got it right.

And other countries are even worse, except on the evolution question, where the US is among the worst. Here’s a messy text file with more results, and here’s an Excel file if you’re keen.

What are we to make of this in this day and age? That the difficulty of eradicating ignorance increases asymptotically?

Do not hit children.

Yes, yes, yes, a thousand times, yes. Pass a law to ban hitting children.

Calif. Lawmaker Seeks Ban on Spanking
California parents could face jail and a fine for spanking their young children under legislation a state lawmaker has promised to introduce next week.

Hitting your children is not an appropriate consequence. There are always better consequences for the things children do.

There’s a step missing, though. Parenting classes need to be available for anyone who wants them.

Case study: There’s a empty house next door. Oldest Boy once threw a couple of rocks through the window. He thought the house was abandoned. The owner wasn’t too pleased. So Boy and I went to see the neighbour and explained, and then he paid to fix the window. (I paid the neighbour, and Boy repaid me a couple of dollars out of his allowance per week.) And that was it. He never felt the need to do it again. I didn’t need to yell at him or hit him.

Hitting children is an entirely useless consequence that has nothing to do with the offense, does nothing to deter repetition, and engenders revenge.

Another thought:

The governor said he and his wife, Maria Shriver, did not spank their four children and used alternative methods for discipline. For example, Schwarzenegger said they found it more effective to threaten to take away their children’s play time if they didn’t do school work.

“They hate that much more than getting spanked,” he told reporters Friday in Los Angeles.

Perhaps the Schwarzenegger children were so well-behaved because if they were naughty, they’d have Arnold Schwarzenegger beating on their ass. Well, maybe not from the sound of it.

UPDATE: If you need another reason not to hit your kids, consider this. It seems to turn them into authoritarian wingnuts. Who then defend the practice of hitting the next generation of kids. Stop the cycle! of Republicanism.

Coming out

I finally came out to my Mom and sister. As an atheist, that is. I’ve noticed that atheists use the term ‘come out’ like gay people do. The comparison is apt. In both cases, you’re confessing something shocking! secret! and socially undesirable. You know your family will be disappointed, and wonder what they could have done differently. And in both cases, there’s really very little you can do to change your orientation. You could fake it, of course, and some people do, but what a waste of your life.

Here’s what family members do when you tell them you don’t believe in God.

They are floored. Then they babble for a minute, asking questions like “Do you think we just evolved? Don’t you know that Satan is working through science? Dad would be rolling over in his grave!” and so on. You can tell they’re thinking, “If I can just say the right thing, then he’ll feel something, and believe again. Now’s my chance! What do I say?” Because of course, what really matters is whether you feel something’s true.

Then they relax a bit and start asking questions. I tried to listen, and answer gently, and be supportive.

“What about all those spiritual experiences on your mission?”
Hey, I’ve had lots of ‘spiritual experiences’, not just on the mission. But experiences are anecdotal, and good data isn’t. A feeling means you had a feeling, not that some spiritual being exists.

“You know, Satan is really working hard, trying to lead people astray.”
What’s that you say? I’m in the grip of an invisible spirit being that may not exist! Oh noes!!!!!!111111!!!!!1one!1 Okay, I admit it was hard to respond to meathead comments like this one gently.

“Are you going to try and lead others away from the Church?”
This was particularly galling. If you believe in all that, you’re meant to shout it from the housetops, but if you believe the opposite, suddenly you’re just supposed to shut the fuck up. Well, a lifetime of evangelism has had its effect, and yes, I will continue to influence people to understand about good evidence, and I will teach critical thinking in my classes, and I’ll be right here on the blog, telling it like it appears to be.

“Well, at least you’re not going to become an atheist, are you?”
I am not kidding, Mom said this. “Well, Mom,” said I, “if you don’t believe in God, an atheist is what you are.” Oh.

The most telling thing was something that both Sis and Mom said. Sis said, “Well, then, what’s the point in all this? Why do you think we go through all this horrible stuff in life?”

I was surprised. “Is life horrible?” I asked.

“Yeah, it really is,” she said. “If I didn’t think I was going on to something better, I don’t know how I’d get through it.”

Atheists are sometimes criticised for saying that there’s no point in life, something I have never heard a real atheist say. It’s true that what we do as individuals really matters very little on the cosmic scale. But my life has a point for me because I give it a point. The only people I hear saying that life on earth isn’t very important is Christians. And, given their assumptions, it makes sense. Compared to eternity, life is just a jot. So why would it matter as long as you get to heaven? Fortunately, most believers act as though they don’t actually believe this, otherwise there’d be an awful mess, no one painting their houses, people plundering the earth’s resources, blowing themselves up for their religion — oh, wait.

Mom said much the same thing. “If I didn’t think Dad was up there waiting for me, I just couldn’t go on.”

And that’s when I thought maybe I was wasting my time saying anything. It’s not like she’s going to change. Some paradigm shifts can drive people insane. And when your worldview or your self-image depends on not understanding, you will not understand. It really gave me an insight into the desperation about life that religious people feel. But it’s not just desperation. It’s hatred. I remembered all those lessons in church about staying unspotted from the World. Don’t get any of the World on you. Hymns describing the earth as a ‘vail of tears’. That’s the view of someone who doesn’t really like life.

Finally Mom said, “Well, the important thing is that you’re a Good Person. And I know you are because of the way you take care of those boys, and the way you live your life.” It seemed important to Mom that I was still a Good Person. I guess I always had the same misconception as she did; that people who break from the Church turn into drug-taking Satanists. But she realised that I had an internalised moral code. So, good for Mom.

I finished my calls with each of them. If I’d called either of them right after that, I’m sure both of their phones would have been busy. And now my open secret’s out. It feels good.

Swearing course in the news

Here’s what happens when you have an interview.

First, the newspaper people turn out to be lovely and fun people, and you have a good old yack about yourself and what you’re doing.

Second, after the interview, you lay awake at night wondering what unfortunate things you might have said that they’ll quote out of context or otherwise mangle.

Then, when the article comes out, you tell yourself to make sure they use a tape recorder next time so they’ll get all the quotes right.

Such is the case with the latest interview in the Post on the swearing course. The publicity’s great, but really about half the quotes seem reconstructed from memory.

Also, I guessed that they’d put the atheist angle right up front. Never mind — some people will be shocked, but I’ve already come out to my mom and sister, so it’s a good time to go public.

The photo makes a little more sense if you realise that the small white object on the right is a bar of soap. It seemed funny at the time.

Well, not bad coverage, and good practice for working with the media. They did spell my name right.

Both sound perfectly plausible.

From Married to the Sea:

Feral child, with a twist

This is interesting:

A woman who disappeared in the jungles of north-eastern Cambodia as a child has apparently been found after living in the wild for 19 years, police said yesterday.

The woman – believed to be Rochom P’ngieng, who would now be 27 years old – cannot speak any intelligible language, so details of her story have been difficult to confirm.

There have been several accounts of feral children isolated from human contact before acquiring language skills, including Amala and Kamala, Genie, and others, but very few involving older children that have gone feral and then returned.

For babies, if they don’t get into a language environment before the ‘critical period’ (about eight or so), their prospects for language learning aren’t good. But if they hear language before then, they’re usually okay. Helen Keller is a good example; she lost her sight and hearing at nineteen months (when she’d presumably have been in the two-word stage), but recovered language ability completely with training.

That’s what I expect to happen in this case. She’s already had the wiring for syntax up until eight, so she should be able to relearn language in her home environment.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Good Reason

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑