Good Reason

It's okay to be wrong. It's not okay to stay wrong.

Page 81 of 126

More for all you swearing fans

I’m rerunning The Swearing Class in August, and word has gotten around. There’s always a great deal of interest in it. In fact, ABC Radio gave me a call today asking me for an interview.

Unfortunately, they asked me to phone in at just the time I’d be picking Oldest Boy up from school. So if it’s sounds like I’m outside with a mobile, trying to stay out of the wind and sun, that’s why.

Still, the hosts were personable and friendly, and I managed to work in just about everything I planned to say. I hope I didn’t get too much wrong. Somehow they got the impression that I’d grown up in Utah, which I didn’t bother to correct. Just for the record, I am a Washingtonian. But I guess I did do a lot of growing up in Utah. They sure were interested in the ex-Mormon angle, but I didn’t belabour it, and I kept it fairly positive.

I’ll post a link to an mp3 file as soon as I get it. Then we can all have fun pointing out my on-air mistakes.

Scientology protests

We are fast approaching the day of reckoning — hackers against the Church of Scientology.

Anonymous internet users who have previously crashed Church of Scientology websites have named February 10 as a worldwide day of protest in a bid to “destroy” the controversial religion.

The group – called Anonymous – which includes skilled computer hackers, has posted a message on YouTube declaring war on Scientology, accusing it of trying to censor the internet and conducting “campaigns of misinformation”.

Advocating acts of vigilante vandalism is always fraught. Encourage the mobs, and the next target of their ire may not be to your liking. YouTube? Wikipedia? Blogger?

And yet, it’s hard to imagine an organisation that has done more to earn the enmity of Netizens more richly. Scientology has a long history of using malicious lawsuits (and even raids) to intimidate and harass people who publish the mythology of their money-making religion. Not to mention the really scary stuff, like infiltration and wiretapping of government organisations. So I’m excited to see what will happen on the 10th. It couldn’t happen to a nicer church.

I know it’s late, but does anyone have info on protests in Perth?

Friday Random Five is playing with my heart

Blue Mood by Swing Out Sister
Album: It’s Better to Travel
I always loved this first album for its jazz sensibility and sophistication. If the members of the post-ZTT Art of Noise had decided to drop the quirkiness and go for musicality, it might have sounded like this, and that would have been good. Not to slight Anne Dudley at all.

There Must Be an Angel (Playing With My Heart) by Eurythmics
Album: Greatest Hits [Europe]
Youngest Boy frequently asks to hear Eurythmics, and who could blame him? No one ever went from arid synthesised cool to beautiful electronic pop with such ease and joy. This song is one of the latter — lashes of gospel choir and soul, complete with Stevie Wonder’s harmonica. How do they make it sound so easy?

This Is a Lie (Palmer Remix) by The Cure
Album: Join the Dots
By a coincidence, this song came up randomly in the car this very morning, and now here it is again. While I don’t have much enthusiasm for the Cure’s later work (anything past Head on the Door actually), I have to applaud this as a solid piece of songwriting. The first half is all orchestral, then joined by Robert Smith on solo guitar.

Here on the blog, you see a lot of the kinds of thoughts I’m dealing in at the time. So you will understand if these lyrics seemed pertinent:

how each of us believes
I’ve never really known
in heaven unseen and hell unknown
how each of us dreams to understand anything at all
why each of us decides
I’ve never been sure
the part we take
the way we are
why each of us denies every other way in the world

It’s not just about religion; the simple act of choosing — a way of life, a life partner, anything — excludes an infinite number of other possibilities. And how do we know we’ve chosen the right one? Or the wrong one? What makes us say ‘This is a lie”?

I haven’t thought about a Cure lyric this much since “How Beautiful You Are”. I feel like an undergrad.

Fields – Fields (Reprise) by The Lilac Time
Album: And Love for All (2006 Remaster)
Stephen Duffy takes us out for a stroll in the country with his guitar. He’s been sleeping in the hedgerow. He knows how you feel, and he knows what you feel is real. The summer wind is making long fingers in the wheat and the undulating fields are cool and inviting. Go with him on this album and you’ll find beautiful bucolic XTC-influenced folk-pop. Other Lilac fans say start with ‘Paradise Circus’, but this is one of my favourite albums ever. Highly highly recommended.

Neon Lights (Ton Up Mix) by Kraftwerk
Album: Toccata Electronica
An interesting remix that overlays “Boing Boom Tchak” lyrics onto “Neon Lights”. Very trancy, and not too annoying.

A bonus sixth.
Alison by Future 3
Album: Blue Skied an’ Clear
There’s an interesting tendency for glitch IDM artists to gravitate toward shoegaze. So this album is a slew of Slowdive covers redone in shimmering electronic tones. Listen to it while you glide silently through smooth rooms. Or when you’re hunched over the laptop working. It won’t jangle you too much.

Maharishi dies

In contrast with my earlier post, the news of the Maharishi’s death is bringing up no complex feelings at all for me; just glee. It’s terrible, isn’t it? I didn’t even know him, but that’s not my fault — I didn’t have a million dollars to give him for the pleasure of hanging out.

I just hate gurus and frauds, and he was both.

He made some pretty astounding claims:

  • Transcendental Meditation is a scientifically valid way to attain enlightenment.
  • TM was responsible for lowering crime rates in cities.
  • Using TM, you could learn to fly.
  • If someone would give a billion dollars, he could train 40,000 expert meditators to combat terrorism

Sadly, even though people gave him tons of money, no one ever learned to fly or to attain enlightenment, as far as anyone knows. And the claims about crime fall apart if you try to examine them with statistics (but how Western!).

The really sad part is that if a mystical movement manages to survive its founder, it usually goes on forever. These people may be bouncing on their butts for generations to come.

Is it better to be right or happy?

Oldest Boy’s school diary has some suggestions for a successful year. Some are uncontroversial, like smiling at people and getting to school on time. But one of the suggestions got me thinking.

It is more important to be happy than right.

Is that so?

Most of the time, there’s no conflict. I feel happy when I’m found to be right, don’t you? And believing wrong things tends to lead to unhappiness. Sure, people can be happy with false beliefs for their entire lives. But I’d guess that knowing what’s right would be more conducive to happiness. Your world-view will match reality a bit better, and there’s less cognitive dissonance.

On the other hand, lately I’m equally happy being shown where I’m wrong. Then I don’t have to believe those wrong things anymore! And when you ‘have to be right’, then ego gets into it, you start defending territory instead of conducting honest inquiry, and you’re very unlikely to find out anything new. No thanks. Show me where I’m factually wrong, and I’ll thank you.

Maybe “being right” means two separate things:

1) Being ‘proven right’ in a discussion. This I don’t care much about, though it’s nice. I’d rather be the kind of person who cares what is right, rather than who is right. If this is the definition, maybe Oldest Boy’s book has a point. Let’s leave this aside.

2) Knowing what’s really going on, as close as we can get.

This second sense of ‘being right’ is, I’d say, more important than being happy. Like I say, usually there’s no conflict. But if there were, I’d want to know what’s true and be miserable.

Lots of people in the USA believed wrong things — that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11, that invading Iraq was a good idea, that Bush was a good president who deserved a second term. They’re pretty happy in their safe houses. They still send emails round to each other about freedom and so on. But they were wrong. And with their false beliefs, they have happily created hell on earth for a lot of people. That kind of happiness looks self-serving and empty to me.

I was pretty happy in my religion of origin. I believed some ideas that are demonstrably false. I could have done so happily (mostly) for the rest of my life, believing that I would live again with my family after I died. But then I would have spent my life in the service of a story, with someone else getting all that tithing money, and no eternity at the end of it. I’ve given up on those stories now, and that was painful. It kind of sucks thinking I’m just going to die someday. But if that’s true, I’d rather know it, and live my life by sound principles.

Is self-deception happiness? Is ignorance bliss? Reality, though tinged with sadness, is all the happiness I need.

Inevitable music gentrification

There I am in the Pizza Hut with Oldest Boy, when I hear “Kill the Poor” over the stereo. “Hey, you’re listening to the Dead Kennedys!” I say.

The pizza guy blinks. “Yeah, no one else has recognised it yet.”

“That’s cool. I went to see them in Salt Lake in ’85. Jello Biafra stage dived on my head.”

“Wow,” says Pizza Man, who may or may not be stoned.

“Who are the Dead Kennedys?” asked Oldest Boy back in the car.

“Are you kidding? Have I never played you any DK’s at all?” I asked. “What kind of father am I?”

It only took a second to dial the iPod to the appropriate folder, not counting the time it took to ignore the irony. Soon we were jamming down the road to “Religious Vomit”. I was explaining how the Dead Kennedys were able to meld British punk into an genuinely American brand of thrash infused with leftist political sensibilities and extremely tight musicianship.

And I thought: Is this an odd situation? My introduction to the Kennedys was not family friendly. I think it was at Chad Smith’s house. I was listening to this grotty obscure punk stuff that no one was listening to, and I felt cool. My son’s introduction to the DK’s was from his Dad’s car stereo. Not particularly counter-culture or transgressive.

I suppose it’s like high school, when you hoped the normal people wouldn’t find out about your music because that was what made you different. But everyone did anyway, which is why alternative music became the new mainstream in 1991, and everybody became hip, which was not cool.

But these things have a way of traveling in cycles. Oldest Boy will find his own sound with its own forbidden allure. And when he does, he’d better tell me about it, unless it sucks.

Australia finally ready to say ‘sorry’

The Howard government steadfastly refused to apologise to Australian Aboriginals for policies that saw children taken from their homes. Now with a new Prime Minister, the hardest word — ‘sorry’ — will finally be said.

Kevin Rudd, the Prime Minister, will deliver the apology to the “stolen generations” on the floor of Parliament on February 13. It will be the Labor Government’s first item of business.

“It’s building a bridge of respect which I think has been in some state of disrepair in recent decades,” Mr Rudd said. “But having crossed that bridge, the other part of it is all about practical business.”

The apology will come more than a decade after a government inquiry established that at least 100,000 children were removed from their parents between about 1869 and 1969. They were placed in orphanages run by churches or charities, or fostered out to socialise them with European culture. Some were brutalised or abused.

Americans, can you imagine what it must feel like for this Australian to see a return to sanity? For years, our respective governments have approached every problem with a stubborn belligerence, doing whatever they wanted, legal or not, moral or not, and they dared us to hold them accountable. Now in Australia at least, reasonable grownups hold the reins. Somehow it makes you feel exhilerated, and want to cry at the same time. I hope you get to experience this soon.

I remember the first Sorry Day in 1998, when people decided to go over Howard’s head, and apologise one on one. I happened to meet an Aboriginal man working at a community market. The place was mostly empty. I chatted with him for a while, and then said, “I just wanted to say sorry.”

He said, “It’s cool.”

But of course it was not cool. Not for him and not for the Native Americans of my own country. Nor for any of the displaced tribes whose history has been forgotten in nation after nation.

So I hope that in addition to a verbal apology, the Rudd government will back it up with money for social programs (in preference to the individuals themselves) to help stop the problems that still plague these communities.

It’s not all kumbaya over here, though. See this page for some truly nasty letters to the editor, including this one.

If being civilised and having modern technology is so hard for this tiny minority of aborigines who want to whinge (wasting tax payers money and destroying the reputation of most aborigines who are very decent hardworking smart people), then why don’t we fence off the National park, they can move there and live without our technology – see how long they last when they don’t even have the wheel.
Posted by: Anthony Henry of 5:40pm January 28, 2008

You stay classy, Telegraph readers.

Pacific Islanders are Asians, not Hebrews

The Book of Mormon tells the story of Hagoth, an ‘exceedingly curious man’ who sails away with some of the Nephites on boats around 55 BCE. They’re never heard from again, and the Book of Mormon narrative continues without them.

When I was on my mission, many of the Polynesian church members I came into contact with were convinced they were descendants of Hagoth (and therefore of Hebrew origin, like everyone else in the Book of Mormon). One Maori missionary even gave an elaborate presentation showing how the Book of Mormon narrative dovetailed with stories of his people’s origin.

And it wasn’t just the rank and file members that advanced the idea:

In the April General Conference of 1962, Elder Mark E. Petersen of the Council of the Twelve said, “As Latter-day Saints, we have always believed that the Polynesians are descendants of Lehi and blood relatives of the American Indians, despite the contrary theories of other men.”

The idea was even taught by President Joseph F. Smith, who told a group of New Zealand Maoris:

“I would like to say to you brothers and sisters… you are some of Hagoth’s people, and there is NO PERHAPS about it!”

But that story’s going to have to go.

Pacific Islanders’ Ancestry Emerges in Genetic Study

The ancestral relationships of people living in the widely scattered islands of the Pacific Ocean, long a puzzle to anthropologists, may have been solved by a new genetic study, researchers reported Thursday.

In an analysis of the DNA of 1,000 individuals from 41 Pacific populations, an international team of scientists found strong evidence showing that Polynesians and Micronesians in the central and eastern islands had almost no genetic relationship to Melanesians, in the western islands like Papua New Guinea and the Bismarck and Solomons archipelagos.

The researchers also concluded that the genetic data showed that the Polynesians and Micronesians were most closely related to Taiwan Aborigines and East Asians. They said this supported the view that these migrating seafarers originated in Taiwan and coastal China at least 3,500 years ago.

There will be a lot of disillusioned Polynesians, if indeed they notice at all.

It seems to me that religions should just stick to statements that can’t be verified. Most of the time, when they say anything falsifiable, it gets falsified.

To the barricades!

From the ABC News:

During his years in Government former foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer developed a strong relationship with Condoleezza Rice.

For the new kid on the block, Stephen Smith, it would have been much harder work during his first meeting with the US Secretary of State.

But at a joint press conference in Washington afterwards it was all praise from both sides.

“Stephen, it’s great to have you here in Washington,” Dr Rice said. “It has really been a very good first meeting, and I look very much forward to meetings in the future.”

The Mr Smith in question happens to be my own Member of Parliament, now Foreign Minister since Labor swept into power. He’s giving the hard word — Australia’s pulling out of Iraq.

“We came to office in November last year with a longstanding commitment that we would withdraw our combat troops from Iraq by the middle of this year, and I advised the Secretary of State that when the current rotation from the Overwatch battle group is completed in the course of the first half of this year, those troops will be withdrawn,” he said.

This is what I like so much about the new Rudd government: they do the right thing, decisions seem to be made sensibly and thoughtfully, and they manage to get it all done without acrimony.

But this is interesting:

“Can I say that from a selfish, personal point of view as a person who comes from Perth in Western Australia, one of the most enjoyable parts of the meeting was inviting the Secretary to come to visit Perth and Western Australia, which I’m happy to announce she gratefully accepted.”

Condi’s coming to Perth? When will the protests be? You know I’ll be there. Perhaps the cream pie brigade could be persuaded to come along. If I can’t see her in an orange jumpsuit in the Hague, lemon meringue would be my second choice.

An ex-Mormon contemplates the passing of GBH

The news of Gordon Hinckley‘s death is bringing up some pretty complex feelings for me.

Hinckley was the president of the LDS Church for thirteen years. He was a likeable gentleman, a tireless traveller, and a savvy media handler. He was also considered by Latter-day Saints to be a prophet whose pronouncements were just as good as scripture, if not better. That’s pretty scary stuff. But he never seemed to be a megalomaniac, always seemed down to earth.

As a Mormon, I raised my hand to sustain him as prophet of a god that I now consider to be an elaborate fairy tale. So now part of me remembers a leader who seemed to be a genuinely kind man, and part of me struggles with the idea that here was someone falsely claiming to speak for a god. Someone who tirelessly promoted falsehoods, believing he was doing good.

Hinckley had a lot of control over the discourse for millions of Mormons. A common saying among conservative Latter-day Saints is “When the Prophet has spoken, the thinking has been done.” Hinckley didn’t seem to use this power for evil, as a lot of people could have. But he never should have had that kind of power in the first place. No human should ever say, “God exists, and I know what he wants you to do” unless they can back it up with facts, which no one ever has. It was wrong for me to say that as a missionary, it was wrong for my parents and teachers to say it to me, and it was wrong for Gordon Hinckley to say it to millions of believing people. It was power unearned and unjustified.

To the end of his life, he believed that he would survive his death, that he would go to the spirit world to meet his family members, that he would give words and symbols to angels who would stand as sentinels to let him into heaven. And he probably thought his belief in the whole elaborate scenario ensured his eternal status. His life was spent in the service of beliefs that were almost certainly false. Even though he was happy with those beliefs, I still feel kind of sad for him, and glad for myself that I somehow managed to see through it all.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Good Reason

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑